3.1 KiB
BuildPulse Decisions
Decision 001 — BuildPulse Starts as Planning Cockpit, Not Agent Framework
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: BuildPulse v0.1 will be a planning cockpit, not a full Agent Pulse event framework.
Reason: The full Agent Pulse concept is powerful but too large for v0.1. The user needs a practical planning and scope-control system first.
Consequences:
- No WebSockets.
- No real agent ingestion.
- No event bus.
- Manual Pulse entries only.
- Pulse-compatible schema from day one.
Decision 002 — Pulse-Compatible From Day One
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: BuildPulse v0.1 will store progress as Pulse-shaped events even when events are manually created.
Reason: This allows future autonomous agents to emit the same event shape without a major data model rewrite.
Consequences:
- Pulse schema includes future-friendly fields such as
agent_id,trace_id,confidence_score,structured_payload, andevidence_refs. - v0.1 UI may not use all fields deeply.
Decision 003 — Single Project in v0.1
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: BuildPulse v0.1 supports one active project only.
Reason: Multiple projects add navigation, filtering, data complexity, and scope risk. The first version should prove the core workflow.
Consequences:
- Project data exists, but only one project is active.
- Multi-project support is parked for later.
Decision 004 — No Phases or Releases in v0.1
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: Phases and releases are not part of v0.1.
Reason: The first version only needs to manage features and parked ideas. Phases/releases become useful after the core feature cockpit works.
Consequences:
- Features are grouped by Now, Next, Later, Done.
- Phases/releases are parked for v0.3.
Decision 005 — Sessions Are Pulse Events in v0.1
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision:
Build sessions are represented as Pulse events with shared trace_id.
Reason: A separate session model adds complexity. Pulse events can already represent session starts, actions, results, and endings.
Consequences:
- Pulse types include SESSION_START and SESSION_END.
- Session view may come later.
- Trace IDs allow grouping session-related pulses later.
Decision 006 — Local-First Storage
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: BuildPulse v0.1 uses local-first storage.
Reason: This keeps the first version simple, fast, private, and easy to run.
Consequences:
- No database.
- No auth.
- Export/import is important to avoid lock-in.
Decision 007 — Export Is a Core Feature
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: Markdown/JSON export is required in v0.1.
Reason: BuildPulse must produce useful handoff context for AI coding agents.
Consequences:
CLAUDE_CONTEXT.mdis a primary output.- JSON and JSONL exports preserve future compatibility.
Decision 008 — Local LLM Is Not a v0.1 Blocker
Date: 2026-05-06
Decision: Local LLMs may assist development but are not required to build or run v0.1.
Reason: The project must not become blocked by local model setup, GPU issues, inference tooling, or model comparisons.
Consequences:
- Claude Code/Codex/cloud tools may build v0.1.
- Local models can be tested as reviewers or for isolated tasks.
- Local/cloud router is parked for later.