Expose prompt and source trace in rank handoff

This commit is contained in:
OpenClaw Bot
2026-05-27 00:43:28 +02:00
parent 5d85e2028c
commit 080f35e230
3 changed files with 15 additions and 1 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Ranker's continuation job is narrow:
Candidate items may include optional 110 `rankerHints` (`value`, `effort`, `confidence`, `urgency`, `revenue`, `novelty`, `risk`). Ranker blends those explicit Scattermind hints with text heuristics; `effort` is inverted into feasibility. Hints improve the defended order, but `recommendedLane: "defer"` or `"park"` remains a safety rail so dashboard-swamp items do not get promoted by flashy wording. For clean bridge handoff, Scattermind should send `sourceSection` and `evidenceNeeded` on each active next move. Scattermind can also send `targetAudience`, `constraints`, `assumptions`, and `nonGoals` / `avoid` at the top level, in `featureSet`, inside `conceptMap.context`, or as a structured top-level `context` object with `summary`, `targetAudience`, `constraints`, `nonGoals` / `avoid`, and `assumptions`; Ranker merges these sources rather than letting a shallow wrapper context shadow deeper Concept Map guardrails. Lens-only Concept Maps may additionally send audience / constraints / assumptions / risk lens content, and Ranker will split sentence-style lens notes into readable decision context instead of leaking `[object Object]`. If Scattermind only has a flat context string, Ranker now extracts simple guardrails such as `Solo builder`, `Manual proof`, `Avoid ...`, `No ...`, and `Do not ...` into `input.decisionContext` / `handoff.decisionContext` so early bridge exports still protect against dashboard/auth/billing drift. Ranker returns that decision context in `input.decisionContext` and `handoff.decisionContext`, and penalizes candidates that conflict with source non-goals (for example saved workspaces/auth/billing before the continuation proof). If Scattermind sends duplicate candidate IDs, Ranker keeps the first ID, suffixes later duplicates (`preview-2`), and reports the normalization in `handoff.warnings` / `handoff.itemTrace` so downstream build-order references remain addressable. Ranker also accepts Scattermind's paid Concept Map object directly when it arrives with top-level `reference_code`, `working_name`, `ideaText`, and string-valued `lenses.channel` / `lenses.risk` fields; the reference code becomes source provenance, the working name becomes the source title, and labelled Build Order text is turned into rank-ready candidates without requiring Scattermind to wrap it first.
Candidate trace note: candidate-level `sourceItemId` / `traceId`, `sourceTitle` / `lensTitle`, and `sourceExcerpt` / `sourceQuote` are preserved in ranked items, `buildOrderDetails`, and `handoff.itemTrace`. Scattermind should use these when a next move came from a specific Concept Map lens sentence, so Ranker can defend not just what wins but where the judgement came from.
Candidate trace note: candidate-level `sourceItemId` / `traceId`, `sourceTitle` / `lensTitle`, and `sourceExcerpt` / `sourceQuote` are preserved in ranked items, `buildOrderDetails`, and `handoff.itemTrace`. The decision `brief.quickGlance.sourceTrace` now repeats the winning item's source section/id/title/quote, and both `brief.source.originalPromptExcerpt` and `handoff.source.originalPromptExcerpt` carry a short prompt excerpt so a downstream Scattermind handoff can show why the build order exists without digging through `input.provenance`. Scattermind should use these when a next move came from a specific Concept Map lens sentence, so Ranker can defend not just what wins but where the judgement came from.
Lane safety note: explicit Scattermind `defer` / `park` hints are hard rails, not mild suggestions. Source `nonGoals` / `avoid` guardrails are also hard enough to keep conflicting candidates out of Do first / Validate next even when their local scoring hints look attractive; the result will mark the lane source as `source-non-goal` so the handoff can explain that the candidate needs guardrail resolution before active work. Handoff `source.requiresSourceTrace` is true only when a real source artifact/title is present; plain idea-only ranking still warns about a missing artifact ID when it carries prompt provenance, but it does not spam source-section/evidence warnings meant for Scattermind artifacts. For low-friction handoff, `/api/rank-feedback` also detects a raw Scattermind/Concept Map JSON object pasted into `idea`, `ideaText`, `optionsText`, or wrapper keys such as `payload`; it expands that object before ranking and reports `input.embeddedPayloadSource` so the public form can accept copy/paste exports without a custom import screen.
+6
View File
@@ -80,9 +80,11 @@ try {
assert.match(data.ranked.find(item => item.id === 'bridge-contract').factors.evidenceNeeded, /Concept Map/);
assert.ok(data.ranked.find(item => item.id === 'bridge-contract').factors.metricHints.value === undefined);
assert.equal(data.brief.source.artifactId, 'snapshot_123');
assert.match(data.brief.source.originalPromptExcerpt, /tiny shop idea/);
assert.match(data.brief.summary, /Source: Tiny shop idea clarity pass · snapshot_123/);
assert.equal(data.handoff.schema, 'rank-feedback-result-v1');
assert.equal(data.handoff.source.artifactId, 'snapshot_123');
assert.match(data.handoff.source.originalPromptExcerpt, /tiny shop idea/);
assert.equal(data.handoff.source.hasOriginalPrompt, true);
assert.equal(data.handoff.source.requiresSourceTrace, true);
assert.equal(data.handoff.itemTrace.length, data.ranked.length);
@@ -662,6 +664,10 @@ try {
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.ranked[0].provenance.sourceId, 'lens-channel-1');
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.ranked[0].provenance.sourceTitle, 'Build Order');
assert.match(sourceExcerpt.ranked[0].provenance.sourceQuote, /Build first/);
assert.match(sourceExcerpt.brief.source.originalPromptExcerpt, /source excerpts/);
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.brief.quickGlance.sourceTrace.sourceId, 'lens-channel-1');
assert.match(sourceExcerpt.brief.quickGlance.sourceTrace.sourceQuote, /defended next move/);
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.handoff.source.originalPromptExcerpt, 'Scattermind exported source excerpts for each recommended move.');
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.buildOrderDetails.doFirst[0].sourceId, 'lens-channel-1');
assert.match(sourceExcerpt.buildOrderDetails.doFirst[0].sourceQuote, /defended next move/);
assert.equal(sourceExcerpt.handoff.itemTrace.find(item => item.id === 'copyable-brief').sourceTitle, 'Build Order');
+8
View File
@@ -1037,6 +1037,12 @@ function createDecisionBrief({ idea, context, mode, ranked, provenance, decision
evidenceQuestion: evidenceQuestionFor(top),
biggestTrap: concernFor(top),
doNotBuildYet: deferred.slice(0, 2).map(item => item.title),
sourceTrace: {
sourceSection: top.provenance?.sourceSection || '',
sourceId: top.provenance?.sourceId || '',
sourceTitle: top.provenance?.sourceTitle || '',
sourceQuote: top.provenance?.sourceQuote || '',
},
} : null;
const assumptions = [
...(decisionContext?.assumptions || []),
@@ -1053,6 +1059,7 @@ function createDecisionBrief({ idea, context, mode, ranked, provenance, decision
artifactId: provenance.artifactId,
snapshotTitle: provenance.snapshotTitle,
conceptMapId: provenance.conceptMapId,
originalPromptExcerpt: cleanText(provenance.originalPrompt, 260),
} : null,
expertReflections: [
{
@@ -1160,6 +1167,7 @@ function createHandoffContract({ ranked, provenance, decisionContext }) {
artifactId: provenance?.artifactId || '',
snapshotTitle: provenance?.snapshotTitle || '',
conceptMapId: provenance?.conceptMapId || '',
originalPromptExcerpt: cleanText(provenance?.originalPrompt || '', 260),
hasOriginalPrompt: Boolean(provenance?.originalPrompt),
requiresSourceTrace: expectsSourceTrace,
},